The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
years ago I remember opening a textbook I think it was an undergraduate still and work from Judith Rappaport at the National Institutes of mental health this would be late 80s early 90s was um had done some neuroimaging or maybe it was pet or some other Imaging technique and had identified portions of the basal ganglia sure caudi putanum type structures in OCD
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.