The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, it's more stable than IQ over a 25 year interval. So, once you're at that point, that's where you are. What are the factors that lead to that? Well, and so what it means is that, about a third of that adults are just not hypnotizable. Two thirds are, about 15% are extremely hypnotizable and we can measure that and give it a number from 0 to 10.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.