The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what it does is it shifts one's attention away from the kind of somatic experience of oh my goodness my heart rate is elevated I'm sweating I'm quaking I'm just I sound terrible I feel terrible I look terrible Etc to a mode of allocating more of our thinking toward analyzing why things might be going wrong
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Then the motivation is how do I utilize the stress to realize the enhancing outcomes? What can we do here, right? to learn from this experience to make us stronger, fitter, um you know, have better science and treatments for the future, deepen my relationships with others, um improve, you know, my priorities and so forth, right?