The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when I'm at a seven that's where learning happens that's very different than it's at a nine and kind of like who's going to turn it off for me or the reason in those situations cuz say I'm not doing my homework is they don't have the skills to bring it to a seven and so their choice is to stay at a nine or 10 out of 10 which no human can do or walk away and bring it to a zero
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.