Andrew Huberman· PhD
now it's not effective for 100% of patients if if you look at the data on average it's about two out of every three people so about 66% of people will benefit
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now it's not effective for 100% of patients if if you look at the data on average it's about two out of every three people so about 66% of people will benefit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you with the therapist or I with a therapist would then start to say well what about the alternative iio I depress The Brak and the brakes don't work but gradually I think well I'm just going to reach over to the handbrake and I'm going to gradually apply the handbrake and that slowly is going to bring the car to a nice safe stop and then I'm going to call the emergency services the car is going to get towed I don't go through the junction I survive everything's fine so you rehearse this alternate ending and you keep going through that rehearsing that