Andrew Huberman· PhD
And so it would be extremely interesting and you know with device use and with with a person's consent you can actually get backend data so you don't rely on self-report. So it can be really um robust kind of evidence.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so it would be extremely interesting and you know with device use and with with a person's consent you can actually get backend data so you don't rely on self-report. So it can be really um robust kind of evidence.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.