The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I just remember thinking how do I put in this this into language that Coleman's going to understand and I just said you know I think uh your goggles are I know one thing for sure which is that your goggles are foggy so you got to so you have to Outsource your decisions now I think you might have also told me to Outsource my identity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it was that idea of you at Foggy goggles you're clearly like not on stable ground everything you believe about yourself just let it be the spokes of a wheel that somebody else can hold for you for a period of time I was like well I can do that