Andrew Huberman· PhD
They had couples go on a date on a stone bridge or a rickety wooden bridge. And the the couples that were on the rickety wooden bridge formed a stronger emotional bond.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
They had couples go on a date on a stone bridge or a rickety wooden bridge. And the the couples that were on the rickety wooden bridge formed a stronger emotional bond.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.