The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I know there's one study in horses that show that that if you pat a horse, many horses find that aversive. So in other words, it's something that they'll work to avoid. And yet that is often how we reinfor. They do enjoy wither scratching. So back at the nape of the the man, if you scratch them there, they'll typically enjoy that.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.