Peter Attia· MD
when you reframe the only way that you know it's a good reframe is because the other person bites on it takes it likes it says oh I prefer to live by this view
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you reframe the only way that you know it's a good reframe is because the other person bites on it takes it likes it says oh I prefer to live by this view
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the reframe is not that this is more true when I teach my students I say when you reframe the only way that you know it's a good reframe is because the other person bites on it takes it likes it says oh I prefer to live by this view