The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We would often send them out to do something challenging. Could be like extended time in nature. There was all these different things. And in that process, the person would struggle. They would face all these different problems. They would have to figure their out and then they would come back and they would be at point B.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we used to call things like this right to Passage so when we had a young person who was at Point a in their life and we needed to get them to point B where they were more confident confident a better contributor to the tribe what would we do we would send them out into nature to do something really hard yeah right and along the way they would struggle they would battle they would have moments of Doubt but they would ultimately come out on the other side realizing that they were capable of a lot more and they could bring that back into society and improve the tribe as a whole