The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we were absolutely adamant that we did not stratify people by what they were addicted to so gambling cutting sex cocaine didn't doesn't matter nor did we stratified people by age socioeconomic status and it was a pressure to do that because certain of the people who had more resources right like wanted that not realizing that what they were asking for was it was the very thing that was gonna stand in the way of their ability to get help
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.