The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's why I often start a couple session with how did you meet? Because usually when people come to couples therapy they think the first thing that's going to happen is you're going to say so what's going on? What's not you know what's then they'll start with the problem and then they're like in that withdrawal from the bank account space. So, I like to say, "Well, tell me how you met."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.