The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And the problem is that, when we are going round and round and round in our head about these things, that cannot be true, we're not in the present moment, right? We're in some other internal world, and that means that, you know, if your grandchild is telling you this hilarious story, you're not really paying attention, because you're in this other world in your head. And so you don't get to have all the joy in life, that comes from being in that moment with your grandchild.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.