We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
in doing that that we both um diminish the suffering of those who are really suffering from those pathologies yeah and we also perhaps um create a little bit of catastrophizing about you know feeling low for an afternoon um might be a great source of of stimulus to go like you know write or think or nap or Insight um and you know I load to think that in people learning terms that somehow they're getting further away from what they need no I I agree
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.