The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Non-exercise induced thermogenesis, right? So non-activity associated thermogenesis. And the fidgeters, right? So the classic work of like Rothwell and Stock. And the idea that some people who overeat are burning off that energy by way of shaking their knee or moving around a lot. The quote/unquote nervous types. But they quoted in those studies, a huge degree of caloric burn, 800, 2500 calories per day burned above those who sit rather still.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.