Paul Saladino· MD
Metabolic dysfunction seems to be better terminology than "insulin resistance." Though the latter term is widely used, it's an inaccurate descriptor and misses much of the important nuance.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Metabolic dysfunction seems to be better terminology than "insulin resistance." Though the latter term is widely used, it's an inaccurate descriptor and misses much of the important nuance.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
While most now accept that metabolic dysfunction* is at the root of today's chronic disease epidemic, we can't seem to agree on what causes this in the first place.
Ultimately, through this conversation, my hope is to help people understand what is truly driving the metabolic dysfunction that underlies so many chronic diseases today.
it's metabolic dysfunction that is causing chronic disease and what is causing metabolic dysfunction it's not carbohydrates
as you and I know and as many of the listeners will know metabolic dysfunction is something connected with all sorts of chronic illness in humans
Casey and I strongly believe that at the root of so many of The Chronic issues that we suffer from today as westerners is metabolic dysfunction