The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and bcra published a a quite sided paper uh like five years after the end of the study in jamama on all the cardiovascular cardiometabolic risk factors and everything was tremendously improved despite the fact that these people were healthy to begin with BMI 22 to 27.9 and so on and remarkable Improvement in all these markers of secondary aging
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.