The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
so I'll quickly run through what their ranges were my ranges for optimal are tighter than these but fasting glucose less than 100 triglycerides less than 150 HDL above 40 for men or 50 for women hemog glob1 C less than 5.7% total cholesterol to HDL ratio less than 3.5 to 1 waist circumference less than 35 in for women or 40 in for men and blood pressure less than 120 over 80
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would much rather see that glucose at 703 and that triglyceride at 50 which to me would say oh this cell's processing through energy great and things are moving through and we're not backing up in the bloodstream we're not converting to triglycerides
here's another study this is from 2019 essentially showing the same thing 12.2 percent are metabolically healthy and they Define it the same way it's these metabolic uh metabolic syndrome criteria so we've got waist circumference glucose hemoglobin A1c blood pressure triglycerides HDL cholesterol