Paul Saladino· MD
But this does NOT mean that carbohydrates caused the problem in the first place, and there is a mountain of evidence to suggest that carbohydrate feeding in metabolically healthy individuals is not harmful.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
But this does NOT mean that carbohydrates caused the problem in the first place, and there is a mountain of evidence to suggest that carbohydrate feeding in metabolically healthy individuals is not harmful.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I believed that someone could be metabolically healthy by including carbohydrates in their diet.
a lot of the population is metabolically unhealthy eliminating carbohydrates can be healthy for helpful for a lot of people it didn't cause the problem you can do that but if you don't correct the thing that's causing the problem the fire's still going to burn
in metabolically healthy populations carbohydrates are not going to cause problems
if you have questions about this in the setting of metabolic dysfunction carbohydrates are hard for people we should eliminate them if you are metabolically broken if you are metabolically healthy carbohydrates won't make you fat
you can lose weight you can be insulin sensitive you can be metabolically healthy and still include carbohydrates in your diet
If you are metabolically healthy, then you can tolerate. There's no problem, right? Carbs aren't the enemy.