Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
it's because just because most clinical trials don't i mean the existing data which is voluminous and all pretty much points in one direction which is is that it's it's going to be beneficial again it all comes with from people that are taking metformin because they're diabetic and so this could be a lot like the wisconsin experiment again where it's not going to work if you do it on people who are healthy right now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's because just because most clinical trials don't I mean the existing data which is voluminous and all pretty much points in One Direction which is is that it's it's going to be uh beneficial again it all comes with from people that are taking metformin because they're diabetic and so this could be a lot like the Wisconsin experiment again where it's not going to work if you do it on people who are healthy right now