The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We don't know, but I was speaking with Greg, who's a friend of mine, he said that he's been repeating this treatment. And, you know, often when these publications come out, we scientists know a lot more than we're telling people. And what he told me, which I'll share with all the audience today is it works multiple times. So he's now getting people to go back five, and there are some reports of people going back 10 years in their blood's biological age.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.