The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in 2014 uh banister published a paper that I think in many ways kind of got the world very excited about metformin so it was almost 10 years ago and I'm sure many people have heard about this paper even if they're not familiar with it but they've heard the concept of the paper and in many ways it's the paper that has led to the excitement around the potential for zero protection with metformin
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.