Andrew Huberman· PhD
that it's actually getting into the deep brain tissue through the skull for I think for most people it's just not intuitive to think about light passing through things that are solid in that way.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that it's actually getting into the deep brain tissue through the skull for I think for most people it's just not intuitive to think about light passing through things that are solid in that way.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.