The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if it doesn't and I've had patients then that's interesting to me as a clinician because it means that your mitochondria is not working well right like the way I see this is you should get spill over you shouldn't kind of use it all and if you're not there's something wrong there that you're using all of it and you're getting no spill over back into your bloodstream which gets filtered into your bladder your urine which you urinate out
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.