The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it seems uh we have preliminary data that that shows the mitochondria might be changing in response to you know this basically you're beaming energy at a c a certain pattern instead of uh with um molecules like glucose and pyrovate and lipids and stuff and you're or light right now you're beaming energy in in another modality as electromagnetic waves
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.