The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and it is produced in the mitochondria as was demonstrated back in 2011 from oxidized cardiolipin um so we have a pretty clear pathway here about how this goes from your mouth to your disease state um hne is super highly reactive it is it damages 27 of the proteins in the cell primarily around mitochondrial function
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
h e damages 27 of the proteins in the cell primarily around mitochondrial function