The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So it's telling you that. They're just so efficient. They're incredibly efficient. Reusing that lactate and keeping it confined to the muscle as another fuel for the adjacent fiber. Exactly. And if you see that in the blood, there's such a low levels of lactate, that means that they have a very good mitochondrial function and they're stimulating that system there.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And that's a way to see the metabolic stress and indirectly as we published a way to look at what is the mitochondrial function.
Whereas the person who doesn't have a very good mitochondrial function cannot oxidize lactate very efficiently locally in the skeletal muscle and they have to export it to the circulation.