The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um a a biomedical engineer Ilas Takanides at UCL has used this because he works on some of his work is on neonates that have had stroke and he takes the neonate and actually does exactly that experiment. He passes red light wavelengths of light through the side of the neonate's head and records them coming out the other side. and he can use that as a metric of how well the mitochondria are functioning in that damaged brain.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.