The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Is the biopsy that you're going to do in this subsequent study going to allow you to differentiate between two plausible hypotheses to explain this observation? One being that they actually make less lactate. The other being their muscles actually utilize more of it before it gets back into circulation. Both of those could explain the observation because you're only sampling in the blood.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.