Andrew Huberman· PhD
It takes them a little time to have a conversation about it, but they act together. And if we're doing something which was over one to two hours, that's that's long enough for them to hold that conversation.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
It takes them a little time to have a conversation about it, but they act together. And if we're doing something which was over one to two hours, that's that's long enough for them to hold that conversation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
The big takeaway here, and it's not controversial to say, I've heard lots of people saying it, and I didn't say it originally, is that they're a community. You can't deal with them in isolation.