The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In other words, white light coming from LEDs is very short wavelength enriched. To me, that's a problem. if short wavelength light is causing dysfunction of mitochondria and I do believe that's the case unless it's balanced by the longer wavelengths
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It's the LED range which is 420 to 440. It's a specific range that the mitochondria absorb and it's the absence of the red light to counterbalance that.