Andrew Huberman· PhD
But it is the case that if people stretch consistently over a given period of several weeks or more that there are changes in the muscles.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But it is the case that if people stretch consistently over a given period of several weeks or more that there are changes in the muscles.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And oftentimes, it can be related directly to these changes in the confirmation of myosin and actin, and within the context of the sarcomeres.
But the idea of making our muscles longer, that reflects a number of processes that occur basically within an existing muscle length.