The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
uh I would say if you ask asked me that question 20 to 25 years ago I would have said no there's no evidence but now if you talk to some GI Specialists they'll say yeah there's some data that it it actually may be beneficial it's certainly not going to hurt and so in patients who have liver failure uh from one thing or another they may actually recommend using that medication as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it supports liver metabolism it it supports liver metabolism and prevents the liver from going into failure so people could literally die if we didn't give them this medication