We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
um I think that probably needs to be taken with a little bit of grain of salt because these were in models that are designed for cancer cells to grow so the same thing would happen if you were to give nutrition to cancer cells on a p Tre dish right that doesn't necessarily mean that that nutrition causes cancer right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.