The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
NAD very biased but that's only because I've seen it work over and over and over in inexplicable scenarios just like you're describing where it's not just you go from A to B but you're going to A to Z very quickly and I used to use the word transformational talking about it not just okay going from a sick state to a well state but and most people going from a well state to a super well State really quickly and it's super impressive
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.