Andrew Huberman· PhD
whereas other tissues and this is now based on you know animal studies the brain might see a reduction by 15 to 20% and the same would be found even in humans looking at the blood
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
whereas other tissues and this is now based on you know animal studies the brain might see a reduction by 15 to 20% and the same would be found even in humans looking at the blood
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you're seeing a consistent clear decline in nad with the aging animal or human but it's i mean it's not a fold reduction it's a percent reduction 10 20 reduction and that's that's the most common thing yeah
animal studies we we have a lot of data on that in in animals? Yeah.
Um, I think it it probably translates to humans. I think in the liver it's related to inflammation and the microbiome.