Andrew Huberman· PhD
And and that was regulated by NAD. I think a few people who listen to this know about NAD. And so NAD seems to be kind of a dial on, you know, the the rate at which energy is transformed.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And and that was regulated by NAD. I think a few people who listen to this know about NAD. And so NAD seems to be kind of a dial on, you know, the the rate at which energy is transformed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.