The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you were then to anticipate food and you're relatively hungry that would double okay so this probably happened when you decide to eat lunch today if you were hungry prior to eating lunch it doubles in the anticipation of the food
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then depending on how much you enjoyed that food it might triple or quadruple it might be lower than it was during the anticipation as we talked about before