The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we use isotop tracers to do that so when our first experiments to give uh with rats to give carbon 14 labeled lactate uh then we would go into the tissues and try to measure it it's all gone it's been burned it's out into the atmosphere meaning the only place that that c14 carbon would be found now is in carbon dioxide if you had a calorimeter
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.