The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is both the duration between desire end effect and when I say effect I mean the rewarding properties of dopamine that are experienced that's important so very short gaps teach the system to expect and want short gaps makes it very hard to pursue things that take longer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the steepness of the rise of that Peak it's very very steep the peak in dopamine is coming up very fast after the desire and in addition to that and this is very important the higher the peak in dopamine and the faster the rise to that Peak the further below Baseline the dopamine drops after the drug wears off
When we engage in an activity, let's say school or hard work of any kind or exercise, because of the reward we are going to give ourselves or receive at the end, we actually are extending the time bin over which we are analyzing or perceiving that experience.