Andrew Huberman· PhD
He pointed me to some study out of Australia where I think it was maybe it might have been nicotenomide that basically prevented um some kind of it wasn't melanoma but it was another type of of skin cancer
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
He pointed me to some study out of Australia where I think it was maybe it might have been nicotenomide that basically prevented um some kind of it wasn't melanoma but it was another type of of skin cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Nicotinomide has been in the food supply for a long time, usually pretty low dose. It's in pro probably every multivitamin. Um, we know it's really safe. We know that it's cancer preventative, which is a very good thing about this class of molecules is that they were tested in Australia, you know, where there's a very high incidence of skin cancer, right? so high that you can do a prospective um preventative clinical trial to see whether nicotinomide supplementation lowers the risk of skin cancer and it does.
And it actually not only didn't increase cancer risk, it lowered >> lowers the risk risk of of melanoma. >> Yep. Yeah. >> Of uh I think it might have been non-melanoma skin cancer like the most common.