Andrew Huberman· PhD
I don’t take it for longevity reasons.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I don’t take it for longevity reasons.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I don’t take NMN for longevity
I'll go on record now saying that I take nmn and in some cases I will take NR and nmn and I observe this is just n of one self- observational data I observe a very clear positive effect but I don't think it has anything to do with extending lifespan