The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I honestly Andrew I think the whole nnnr debate is irrelevant I I think it's just a commercial debate I think it's literally just posturing about how can I carve out a different Market I don't think there's a scientific reason to favor one over the other
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I can't remember if it was NR or nmn but honestly I don't think it matters because I think they're basically equivalent — once just got a phosphate group on there you might need to take a little bit more of the nmn versus NR or maybe a lot more who knows in order to get the same increase in NAD is my understanding
NMN vs. NR