The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Animal data looks like NAD and N&M can be advantageous especially for unexplained infertility which to be clear is different than I just want to get pregnant right and unexplained infertility you're not conceiving we do the basic test anatomy ovulation ovarian reserve seam analysis they're all fine so I view that as chronic inflammation unless proven otherwise and so that's a unique situation that patients may have potential benefit
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.