The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So I think this is an important distinction to make, though, like there's a difference between safe and effective, right? Just because we say something as safe, doesn't mean it's going to work enough. And in fact sometimes things that are the most safe aren't going to work at all. That's why they're so safe is they don't have any effect. But we do know that NR is largely safe, you know, millions of people around the world take it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But we do know that NR is largely safe, you know, millions of people around the world take it.
i will say i think it's very safe i really don't see a downside other than to your pocketbook of taking nr or nmn
i will say i think it's very safe i really don't see a downside other than to your pocketbook of taking nr or nmn
Well, um NR is the most, you know, safety tested NAD booster on on the market.
you know, for for for most people, you know, 500 milligrams to 1,000 milligrams is a is a substantive amount of of NR to take.
So, as you know, the F in FDA stands for food. And um nutritional supplements are in under the F in FDA. And so because Nigen went through the process of being a uh compound that is generally regarded as safe and as a new dietary ingredient, if there are any complaints or observations or clinical trial observations that are linked to NR, there's a file on them, you know, that we're aware of. And so far the safety data look really good.