Andrew Huberman· PhD
NR they claim I'm not this is not my claim but they claim that NR is quote unquote 25% more effective than NN in raising whole blood NAD levels but I'm guessing that's milligram for milligram right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
NR they claim I'm not this is not my claim but they claim that NR is quote unquote 25% more effective than NN in raising whole blood NAD levels but I'm guessing that's milligram for milligram right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and we compare them in terms of both what's known known and what is not known about their ability to get into cells and any efficacy they may have for either longevity or health span
NR and nmn are quite similar except for the presence of a phosphate group on NR that gets cleaved off
but I've opted to take sublingual nmn mostly based on cost and are at the dosages people recommend is quite expensive