Andrew Huberman· PhD
a supplement that I'm going to argue has very little scientific basis for its justification
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
a supplement that I'm going to argue has very little scientific basis for its justification
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now taking n is that going to increase longevity I don't think so that's my opinion because longevity is not just one supplement or two or three or four or five it's a compendium on on an incredible amount of things that happen at the C Level and I don't think that One supplement
I think that the evidence that NAD and its precursors is geroprotective meaning we are going to take a bunch of people who don't have disease and we're going to make them live longer I think this is I think this is uh very very low probability