We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
and they the investigators in that study jump to the conclusion oh look we know what's going on with the gut because they have this organism you know what's worth you biophilia or you know they don't have this organism they clearly have an unhealthy gut microbiome and I think that is an extrapolation and we do not know that and clinically nobody is a saying anything clinically in that study they didn't do inflammatory markers they didn't follow those people moving forward
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.