Paul Saladino· MD
chronometer doesn't understand that vitamin E is in animal fat and so it's telling me I'm not getting enough vitamin E which is bunk I've tested vitamin E in the past and it's well within normal levels
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
chronometer doesn't understand that vitamin E is in animal fat and so it's telling me I'm not getting enough vitamin E which is bunk I've tested vitamin E in the past and it's well within normal levels
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's telling me I'm not getting enough vitamin E which is false because when I've done my blood work my vitamin E levels are just fine I think that chronometer and the databases that are used for this are often miscalculating vitamin E because we don't understand that vitamin E is an animal fat